Hitchcock's Narrative Strategies
SUSPENSE: GENERAL OVERVIEW
Hitchcock’s genius was not simply his ability to create suspense, but his ability to allow the viewer to share suspense with a character. This very much relates to how his films fundamentally function; we are made to relate to characters, identify with them in order to experience suspense on their behalf. At the same time, we are often privileged with knowledge that the character is not privy to; thereby creating a sense of self-consciousness that positions us (as audience) outside of that narrative world. Hitchcock pulls us into the story and then makes us aware of the artificial framework of that story. While a film like ‘Sabotage’ definitely makes us feel a sense of anticipation and unsureness (dictionary definition suspense), it is at the same time a film ABOUT suspense as a narrative strategy. Hitchcock’s films show us that a final form can subtly reveal the methodology functioning behind the work, without letting that methodology strangle or deaden the visual form. This reminds me of Peter Greenaway’s comment that while he builds his films systematically, he does not want them to be perceived systematically. How, in my own work, can I work with a generative methodology that doesn’t overcome the final visual piece?
SUSPENSE: AND STRUCTURE
As Ian Cameron observes with regard to ‘The Man Who Knew Too Much’, “Hitchcock has realized that suspense cannot be produced in an instant, but must be built up carefully. We are ensnared gradually via curiosity, suspicion, apprehension and worry.” (Hitchcock; Suspense, Humour and Tone; p.26)
There are some fascinating precedents to learn from in looking at how Hitchcock used suspense to structure film narrative. In building my own sequences (both in a book and as motion sequences) – it would be helpful to understand conventions of building suspense in a visual sequence. What can I take from filmic narrative structure and use in my own visual sequences to amplify the textual content of my own narratives?
Hitchcock’s genius was not simply his ability to create suspense, but his ability to allow the viewer to share suspense with a character. This very much relates to how his films fundamentally function; we are made to relate to characters, identify with them in order to experience suspense on their behalf. At the same time, we are often privileged with knowledge that the character is not privy to; thereby creating a sense of self-consciousness that positions us (as audience) outside of that narrative world. Hitchcock pulls us into the story and then makes us aware of the artificial framework of that story. While a film like ‘Sabotage’ definitely makes us feel a sense of anticipation and unsureness (dictionary definition suspense), it is at the same time a film ABOUT suspense as a narrative strategy. Hitchcock’s films show us that a final form can subtly reveal the methodology functioning behind the work, without letting that methodology strangle or deaden the visual form. This reminds me of Peter Greenaway’s comment that while he builds his films systematically, he does not want them to be perceived systematically. How, in my own work, can I work with a generative methodology that doesn’t overcome the final visual piece?
SUSPENSE: AND STRUCTURE
As Ian Cameron observes with regard to ‘The Man Who Knew Too Much’, “Hitchcock has realized that suspense cannot be produced in an instant, but must be built up carefully. We are ensnared gradually via curiosity, suspicion, apprehension and worry.” (Hitchcock; Suspense, Humour and Tone; p.26)
There are some fascinating precedents to learn from in looking at how Hitchcock used suspense to structure film narrative. In building my own sequences (both in a book and as motion sequences) – it would be helpful to understand conventions of building suspense in a visual sequence. What can I take from filmic narrative structure and use in my own visual sequences to amplify the textual content of my own narratives?